thy1 1 mice (Jackson Laboratory)
Structured Review
![( A ) Recipient mice (Thy1.2 + ) were transferred with mixed OVA-specific Cd69 +/+ <t>(Thy1.1</t> + Thy1.2 + ) and Cd69 −/− (Thy1.1 + Thy1.2 − ) T H 2 cells (1 × 10 7 cells) followed by intranasal OVA exposure. i.n.: intranasally; i.v.: intravenously. ( B ) Plots of Cd69 +/+ and Cd69 −/− CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the lung (left) and absolute numbers ( n = 5) (right). ( C ) Confocal micrograph of the lung at day 35 (left). V: vessels. Frequency of transferred Cd69 +/+ (yellow) and Cd69 −/− (red) CD4 + T cells in iBALT ( n = 5) (right). DAPI: 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( D ) Recipient mice (Ly5.2 + ) were transferred with the mixed OVA-specific creER T2 Cd69 +/+ (Ly5.1 + Ly5.2 − ) and Cd69 fl/fl (Ly5.1 + Ly5.2 + ) T H 2 cells (1 × 10 7 cells) followed by intranasal OVA exposure. i.p.: intraperitoneally. ( E ) Plots of creER T2 Cd69 +/+ and Cd69 fl/fl cells in Ly5.1 + CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the lung on day 49 and ( F ) absolute numbers (PBS, n = 8; TAM, n = 13). ( G ) Experimental protocol to investigate the functional impact of CD4 + T RM cell egress from the lungs on airway inflammation. ( H ) Absolute numbers of eosinophils (Eos.), neutrophils (Neut.), lymphocytes (Lymph.), and macrophages (Mac.) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). ( I ) Representative H&E-stained lung sections. ( J ) Experimental protocol to assess the impact of CD69 ablation in CD4 + T RM cells under BCG infection. ( K ) Representative plots of CD45(iv) − CD44 hi CD69 + CD4 + T cells in the lung at day 49. ( L ) Absolute numbers of CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in PBS-treated ( n = 10) or TAM-treated ( n = 10) mice. Pooled data from two independent experiments. [(B), (C), (F), and (H)] Data of more than two independent experiments. Significance was determined by an unpaired U test in (B) and (C) and a one-way ANOVA in (F), (H), and (L). Data represent the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_0599/pmc13060599/pmc13060599__sciadv.adw1038-f1.jpg)
Thy1 1 Mice, supplied by Jackson Laboratory, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thy1 1 mice/product/Jackson Laboratory
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "CD69 regulates the tissue dynamics of epigenetically imprinted memory CD4 + T cells"
Article Title: CD69 regulates the tissue dynamics of epigenetically imprinted memory CD4 + T cells
Journal: Science Advances
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw1038
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Recipient mice (Thy1.2 + ) were transferred with mixed OVA-specific Cd69 +/+ (Thy1.1 + Thy1.2 + ) and Cd69 −/− (Thy1.1 + Thy1.2 − ) T H 2 cells (1 × 10 7 cells) followed by intranasal OVA exposure. i.n.: intranasally; i.v.: intravenously. ( B ) Plots of Cd69 +/+ and Cd69 −/− CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the lung (left) and absolute numbers ( n = 5) (right). ( C ) Confocal micrograph of the lung at day 35 (left). V: vessels. Frequency of transferred Cd69 +/+ (yellow) and Cd69 −/− (red) CD4 + T cells in iBALT ( n = 5) (right). DAPI: 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. ( D ) Recipient mice (Ly5.2 + ) were transferred with the mixed OVA-specific creER T2 Cd69 +/+ (Ly5.1 + Ly5.2 − ) and Cd69 fl/fl (Ly5.1 + Ly5.2 + ) T H 2 cells (1 × 10 7 cells) followed by intranasal OVA exposure. i.p.: intraperitoneally. ( E ) Plots of creER T2 Cd69 +/+ and Cd69 fl/fl cells in Ly5.1 + CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the lung on day 49 and ( F ) absolute numbers (PBS, n = 8; TAM, n = 13). ( G ) Experimental protocol to investigate the functional impact of CD4 + T RM cell egress from the lungs on airway inflammation. ( H ) Absolute numbers of eosinophils (Eos.), neutrophils (Neut.), lymphocytes (Lymph.), and macrophages (Mac.) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). ( I ) Representative H&E-stained lung sections. ( J ) Experimental protocol to assess the impact of CD69 ablation in CD4 + T RM cells under BCG infection. ( K ) Representative plots of CD45(iv) − CD44 hi CD69 + CD4 + T cells in the lung at day 49. ( L ) Absolute numbers of CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in PBS-treated ( n = 10) or TAM-treated ( n = 10) mice. Pooled data from two independent experiments. [(B), (C), (F), and (H)] Data of more than two independent experiments. Significance was determined by an unpaired U test in (B) and (C) and a one-way ANOVA in (F), (H), and (L). Data represent the means ± SEM. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, and **** P < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Functional Assay, Staining, Infection
Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Volcano plot of the differential gene expression between CD4 + T RM cells and CD4 + T CIRC cells identified in fig. S5 (A to E). ( B ) Plots of CD69 and S1PR1 in Ly5.1 + CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the lung of the OVA-treated mice at day 49 shown in fig. S6A. ( C ) Absolute numbers of CD45(iv) − S1PR1 + CD4 + T cells in the mice transferred with creER T2 Cd69 +/+ T H 2 cells ( n = 9) or creER T2 Cd69 fl/fl T H 2 cells ( n = 10). Pooled data from two independent experiments. ( D ) Absolute numbers of CD45(iv) − CD4 + T cells in the three groups ( n = 4 or 5). Data of two independent experiments. ( E ) Confocal micrograph of the lungs at day 49. B: bronchiole. ( F ) Absolute numbers of Ly5.1 + memory CD4 + T cells in iBALT. Data of two independent experiments. ( G ) H&E-stained lung section (top). Lungs were collected from the mice treated as shown in fig. S2A. The vessel wall, iBALT, and a parenchyma area located 200 μm from blood vessels were chosen to measure S1P levels by mass spectroscopy. The S1P intensity in these regions is shown (bottom). ( H ) Average peak intensities of S1P in each region. ( I ) Confocal micrograph of the lungs at day 35. Lungs were collected from the mice treated as shown in fig. S6H. ( J ) Absolute numbers of CD69 + Thy1.1 + cells (left) and CD69 − Thy1.1 + cells (right) in concentric distance zones from Lyve-1 + lymphatic vessels. Data represent the means ± SEM. Significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA in (C), (D), and (F), by paired one-way ANOVA in (H), and by an unpaired U test in (J). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Gene Expression, Staining, Mass Spectrometry

